It’s not business. It’s personal.

Women, unable to travel hundreds of miles for access to family planning healthcare and access to abortion. Women, using Cytotec to induce abortions because their legal access is severely restricted. States, enacting laws that require a waiting period before abortions. States, requiring a woman to undergo an invasive, medically unnecessary ultrasound before allowing a woman to obtain an abortion. The Supreme Court, ruling that a buffer zone around abortion clinics, which allow for the safety of the women and employees entering the clinic, is unconstitutional because it infringes upon the First Amendment rights of protestors to initiate, “personal, caring, consensual conversations.” Employers, refusing to pay for contraception coverage because they erroneously believe certain types of contraception to be abortifacients. The Supreme Court, siding with the employers.

Yesterday I spent the day reeling and blowing up friend’s Facebook feeds with stories about the SCOTUS Hobby Lobby decision, which allow closely-held companies, (Chick Fil A is an example of a closely-held company. It’s not just small companies,) to deny women access to contraception via insurance coverage if they have a sincerely-held religious objection to the contraception. The ruling was narrow, so as to make sure that only contraception, (for now) is affected by the ruling. Things like vaccinations, blood transfusions, and anti-depressants are not included as things that can be denied because of a sincerely-held religious belief. Why? Because it is clear that the majority on the ruling, all five of them Catholic, are logic contortionists who wanted this to just affect contraception. It is also of note that Chief Justice Roberts stated that it does not matter if the sincerely-held belief is factually incorrect, so long as it is sincerely held.
At the end of the day I told Mike that I feel like we were moving backward for women. That is my sincerely-held belief. Still, in 2014, healthcare decisions are not solely between a woman and her doctor; five men have the power to deny access to contraception to women in the United States.

After that, I envisioned the five justices dancing a kick line to “Every Sperm is Sacred”.

It’s not academic
Many people are having debates about this ruling online. For some, it’s purely academic. For one, they are not women, and so would never have any personal use or need for contraception. Some of them just want to debate the minutiae of law and logic. I saw one woman suggest that it was a political issue. I suppose that’s true for some people. Conservatives have generally sided with Hobby Lobby because they are either against the use of contraception, they believe IUDs and the morning after pill to be abortifacients, (they aren’t) they believe a company should be allowed to pick and choose what benefits they pay for, even if it leads to discrimination, (and it does. For instance, vasectomies are covered with Hobby Lobby,) or all three. Liberals tend to side with women and their right to treat their body as theirs, along with the medical decisions made for it.

But for millions of American women, it’s not just something to argue about. Their lives, and the quality of their lives, are at stake. In one fell swoop, five Supreme Court justices placed in jeopardy reasonable, affordable access to contraception. I don’t know how that doesn’t make all women angry. It’s like going back to the days when contraception was first available; only married women could have it, and they had to have permission from their husband first. Ladies, this is a manifestation of patriarchy, pure and simple. This is not, at the end of the day, about religious conscience. This is about having the ability to exercise control over what women do and do not have access to.

Those who would argue, (Matt Walsh) that it doesn’t prevent women from getting the contraception, they just have to pay for it themselves, are clearly living in La La Land. If you’ve ever worked an hourly retail job, you know that coming up with over $3000 to pay for an IUD just isn’t going to happen.
Some offer a solution of simply finding another job. This thinking is La La Land adjacent. I sincerely doubt that a majority of the women working there turned down a plethora of employment opportunities because, ever since they were little girls, they dreamed of working at Hobby Lobby.
There are those who wonder: Why is contraception so fundamentally important? Why is this worth fighting over? There are a few reasons. It lowers health care costs. Think about it. A five minute office visit to insert my IUD costs significantly less than the alternative: invasive surgery to ablate my uterine wall, which may or may not work, so I’d still need to use birth control because pregnancy would be dangerous. And if that didn’t work, I’d need a hysterectomy and medical care to help me undergo early menopause. When used as birth control, contraception helps to avoid unplanned pregnancies, which avoids costs related to hospital births. If that child were to have any mental or physical health issues, insurance would then need to pay out for any medical care that unplanned child needed.

Another reason is that is helps to improve the quality of life for women. Plenty of uterine, ovarian, and hormonal issues are solved with the use of contraception, such as: Polycystic Ovary Syndrome; adenomyosis; fibroid tumors; endometriosis; ovarian cysts; amenorrhea; prevention of endometrial and ovarian cancer; alleviation of PMS, heavy periods, and acne. For instance, my hormonal IUD treats my adenomyosis. Without the IUD, I would continue to double over in pain, both during and in between my periods and bleed in between my periods. When I would have my actual period, my flow would be so heavy that it would cause me to become weak and nearly pass out. This is because it liked to gush out all at once at times like first thing in the morning. Cleaning myself after using the toilet would look like I had just committed murder because my hand would be so covered in blood.

Okay, but there are still women using contraception solely as birth control. Those slutty sluts should just abstain from sex.
Okay. You win. You’re absolutely right. Abstinence is the only way to prevent pregnancy. We should totally force only women to abstain by taking away their decision to use birth control, even if it would hurt women because of course they’re not going to stop having sex just because they don’t have birth control. (Mass graves for children of unwed mothers in Ireland support that.) And if only women are forced to abstain, that will totally prevent unwanted pregnancies from rape and incest. Also, all the married women for whom pregnancy would cause serious health issues, up to and including death, could you go ahead and just stop having sex with your husbands? Thaaa-aaaaanks!

So you see, for me, this Supreme Court decision isn’t academic or political. It’s personal. It’s personal for me as a woman, as a user of contraception for medical and birth control reasons, and as an American citizen. It’s personal because now I have to worry about whether or not it will ever affect me and my insurance coverage. It’s personal because this Supreme Court decision essentially affirms that women are second class citizens. We are second class citizens whose healthcare decisions may be decided by someone else, whose only vested interested is to have control. It also affirms that pointed and blatant discrimination of us second class citizens is A-okay.

Image source

One thought on “It’s not business. It’s personal.

  1. I see both sides of this and I have sympathy with those really believe it is a moral no-no. But I think this is wrong. Companies need to stay out of medical decisions. If they really don’t want to be a part of it (and oooooh them having stocks in birth control companies is just so epic) then they need to sell the company and retire to Bermuda.

    da end.

    I hate abortion. I’m never going to be able to feel otherwise and at this point with all I’ve been through I won’t even apologize for it. I don’t hate the women who get one (goodness knows I’m sure 99.9999% of them don’t want to be in the position of choosing to have one), but the act itself- yeah I hate it. But the ramifications of not having it legal are just too bad to consider going back to. The key is choice. I can choose never to have one, someone else can choose to have 12.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s